Login Register

Wind turbine plans for Severn Vale approved

By Ben_Falconer  |  Posted: May 14, 2014

Sharpness Dock

Comments (5)

A MASSIVE wind turbine in the Severn Vale is set to be built after an impassioned debate by decision makers.

After almost an hour of argument over it, Stroud District Council planning committee approved the building of a 122 metre-high turbine at Sharpness.

The applicant said it could provide power for up to 700 homes.

Councillor Haydn Jones (Conservative, Severn) said although not in the Cotswold Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty as applications which have gone before, the Severnside landscape has its own value.

“I don’t support this,” he said at the meeting on Tuesday. “I think down on the edge of the estuary is the wrong place.”

He said it ‘has more designations than any where else’ and the old docks is a conservation area.

“There are specific planning guides that say you should not put anything in there which interrupts the view of these sites,” he said. “It’s also a flyway to migrating birds. Having that one turbine there could have massive effect on it.

“I am not against wind power, and not against green power in th right place. I am fully in favour of green power - we should have a nuclear station that will generate a proper amount of electricity rather than the little amount this will.”

The only other similar turbine in the district is at Nympsfield, built after a massive planning battle almost 20 years ago, and around three years ago the council rejected plans for a wind farm at North Nibley.

Stroud District Council’s officers recommended planning permission be granted for the application by Partnership For Renewables Ltd.

Consent was approved, by seven votes to two.

Coun Martin Whiteside (Green, Thrupp) said: “I would support this strongly for reason of generating renewable energy but I would agree that Sharpness is a special and very beautiful place.

“It is very unique. I think that having a turbine will be an asset to the visual amenity.”

Coun Rowland Blackwell (Con, Nailsworth) said: “I have got to support this. I think it’s in an ideal location. It’s a semi-industrial area.

“We have got one on our doorstep on green fields and you look across and you can see it ticking over and there is some cheap electricity there. “And this will provide a lot of cheap electricity.”

After the meeting a PFR spokesman said none of the statutory consultees responsible for concerns raised over noise, appearance and bird migrations objected to the application.

“The dock area is of course a working industrial site, and there is already a tall building close to the turbine location, and officers, supported by the committee, concluded that there would not be a significantly adverse impact on views.”

Strict noise criteria were set which it will have to comply with

Read more from Gloucester Citizen

Do you have something to say? Leave your comment here...

max 4000 characters


  • CinderfordSid  |  May 20 2014, 11:58AM

    Maybe we'd prefer a new nuclear power station at Oldbury? (this is rhetorical)

    |   -1
  • P_I_Staker  |  May 15 2014, 9:14AM

    The correct place for wind turbines is not in my back yard!

    |   -1
  • ryankeen3  |  May 14 2014, 10:29PM

    another waste of space and a fat cheque for the landowner and builder of the eyesore, have never and will never produce any energy without subsides from our paying extra on the energy bills. Cannot work without a power station running constantly in case the wind drops. Even the Germans are turning back to coal

    |   -1
  • RoadWombat  |  May 14 2014, 5:49PM

    "I think that having a turbine will be an asset to the visual amenity." Has any normal person, EVER, said to their wife/husband/boyfriend/child, "Oh, look at that - isn't it an asset to the visual amenity!" ?? I suppose Martin Whiteside is trying to appear clever on the run up to the elections...

    |   -2
  • LordGagas  |  May 14 2014, 5:15PM

    Only one?, we should have more.

    |   4