Login Register
 °

News focus: Major decision due over Stroud 'Store Wars' part two

By Ben_Falconer  |  Posted: July 21, 2014

  • Stroud Against Supermarket Saturation are opposed to a new ASDA at Lightpill

  • Matthew Large of Stroud Metal Company wants to see a new supermarket so his business can expand

  • Eileen Halliday opened the Sainsbury's store in Dudbridge after the first episide of Store Wars

  • Brunsdon Yard at Ryeford has been recommended for refusal

Comments (7)

PART two of Stroud Store Wars will be played out at showdown meeting this week as rival developers fight for the right to build another supermarket near the town.

Twenty years after Sainsbury’s won a battle to join Tesco and Waitrose on the edge of Stroud, Stroud District Council development control committee will scrutinise three rival bids.

On Thursday evening (July 24), elected members will consider a recommendation to grant permission for ASDA at Daniels Estate at Lightpill, and knock back two other proposed schemes.

Campaigners belive all three should be turned down and the special planning meeting is likely to see heated debate.

While planning policy tests show that the town may be able to take one more supermarket, pressure group Stroud Against Supermarket Saturation disagrees.

“There is some logic in bringing the three supermarket applications together for consideration,” said a group spokesman.

“However there is a clear danger, that this becomes a beauty pageant, with the least problematic proposal being recommended for approval.

“The key unanswered question is whether there is an actual need for a further supermarket in Stroud.

“It is clear from the independent analysis that an additional supermarket in the area will have a devastating impact on Nailsworth, Stonehouse and Stroud town centres – with up to 12% of trade lost from local shops.

“Consumers are increasingly using the internet to do their supermarket shop, limiting the need for more huge out of town supermarkets to be built. This is about developer greed, not customer need.

“Last time councillors were in this situation with the Sainsbury’s development, the council provided seed funding for the farmers market to limit the impact a supermarket would have on the town centre. What steps will they take to protect local town centres this time?”

In 1994, so-called Store Wars broke out after Stroud District Council turned down three proposals for supermarkets just outside Stroud - Sainsbury’s got permission on appeal.

Now ASDA appears to have the best chance of joining the other three in Stroud but Joanne Hampton, who lives near the site said it will spoil their neighbourhood.

“No other supermarket in Stroud is bordered by residential housing,” she said.

“The recommendation to green light the Asda development on Bath Road will make life unbearable for the hundred households surrounding the site if councillors vote this through, with increased traffic, parking restrictions, noise, light and air pollution. The 12 councillors that make up the development control committee should ask themselves this question - ‘would they like to live opposite a 24 hour supermarket and petrol station?’ and vote accordingly.”

Stroud Metal Company boss Matthew Large said the recommendation to turn down his site, for a supermarket believed to be Morrisons, is a blow to the company.

His Avocet Industrial Estate, Dudbridge site is opposite a site that was refused in 1994. He wants to move to safeguard jobs and expand the company.

“I am understandably very disappointed by the officers recommendation,” he said.

“A refusal to grant planning on this site would be a real kick in the teeth for Stroud Metal at a time when we are desperate to expand and we are growing very rapidly and employing more people including apprentices.

“We are concerned that officers appear to have failed to consider what will happen to the site if this rare redevelopment opportunity is missed.

“We can address the flooding issues but the costs of redevelopment and relocation of Stroud Metals will make most alternative schemes unviable meaning that the site will continue in a spiral of decline and could stand derelict for the next 20-plus years.

“This is a unique redevelopment opportunity on land which lies within a Conservation Area and it would seem that if there is to be a new foodstore in Stroud one this is the one that is favoured by Stroud Town Council and Cainscross Parish Council, so we have the bulk of the parish support in that respect.

“SMC will not cut and run with the money from the sale of our site and are anxious to be bound by a section 106 agreement to reinvest the proceeds of the sale of our land into a new 79,000 sqft factory for Stroud Metal on Brunel Way.

“Both the Daniels site and ours will both generate approximately the same numbers of supermarket jobs, therefore the focus should be on what happens to the displaced jobs.

“Our scheme will guarantee the highest number of skilled engineering jobs being retained in the town as well as the opportunity for further expansion created.

“Ultimately, the decision of which site should be granted planning is down to the committee members. This application is not just about a foodstore and I hope that they will see that it is our site that is most in need of regeneration and that it offers the greatest benefits for the town.”

It has been recommended for refusal because of flood risk, it is less accessible than the other sites, it does not make a positive contribution to the Stroud Industrial Heritage Conservation Area, and it would threaten Stroud and Nailsworth town centres if it and ASDA got the thumbs up.

The former Brunsdon site at Ryeford also lost out in 1994 and is expected to again. It is recommended for refusal because it is too far away from a town centre to be sustainable and if given permission with ASDA, would be one supermarket too many.

Property Alliance Group is behind the proposal, which does not have a named supermarket behind it.

“PAG is surprised at the view taken by council officers,” said a company spokesman.

“It is a curious position to recommend building a food store on an occupied employment site with perfectly serviceable buildings in a congested area already served by two supermarkets, rather than on a derelict, contaminated and disused site in Stonehouse.

“Officers have recommended refusal but the final decision is with members. We are currently providing officers with further information that meets the issues now being raised at this late stage.”

Doug Wilson, head of UK property communications for ASDA, said: “We welcome the planning officer’s recommendation and look forward to putting our case to councillors on July 24. We’d like to thank the local community for their continued support.”

The meeting at the council’s Ebley Mill headquarters starts at 6pm. Follow the debate on the night with Stroud Life editor Ben Falconer on Twitter, @benfalconer and on stroudlife.co.uk.

Read more from Gloucester Citizen

Do you have something to say? Leave your comment here...

max 4000 characters

7 comments

  • JemmyWood  |  July 22 2014, 9:15PM

    Rose22, you should come over to Quedgeley and Hardwicke and see the 2000 odd homes from Stroud's housing allocation which has dumped on our doorstep. It's a undenyable fact, eveytime someone wants to build something new in Stroud, be it houses or a supermarket, the Stroud Rent-a-NIMBYs come out in force. They wouldnt build a supermarket if they didn't think there was a need for it. But lets take your view... No Supermarket... Why not then, build houses/flats on the site?

    |   2
  • rose22  |  July 22 2014, 3:59PM

    jemmywood I think you should come to Stroud and see all the new houses that are going up Ebely which is were stroud council is based is surrounded by new building hundreds of them we have even lost greenfield s to housing So be for you shout NIMBYs You should get your facts straight. We feel has angree has you do having all this housing but there is nothing we can do The truth is we are short of houses. We just don't need more supermarket in Stroud

    |   -2
  • MentalBeaver  |  July 22 2014, 3:05PM

    Where is the site at Ryeford? Is it the one behind the kebab van?

    |   1
  • thomas1996  |  July 22 2014, 10:58AM

    Definetely don't need another Morrisons, the new one in Gloucester at Metz Way has been a right flop. It's like a morgue on weekdays and the firm made many of the staff redundant only 6 months after it opened!

    |   4
  • JemmyWood  |  July 21 2014, 8:44PM

    Mmmmm...well Stroud has a long history of dumping its housing allocation on the boundarys of Quedgeley and Hardwicke without a blink of an eye or a Stroud NIMBY in sight. So you could say Stroud thought it imperative to build everywhere apart from Stroud. The Chickens are coming home to roost....

    |   7
  • Apothegm_  |  July 21 2014, 6:50PM

    It is surely not imperative to build something, supermarket or houses, on *every* piece of land in Stroud?

    |   -2
  • JemmyWood  |  July 21 2014, 6:01PM

    And the Stroud NIMBYS are out again.... This time complaining about an ASDA because of blah blah blah blah blah.... I'll tell you what Stroud NIMBYs, if you don't want an ASDA, how about building some houses on the site instead? Whats that? New build houses would be unsuitable because of even more blah blah blah blah blah? What a surprise........ Stroud = NIMBY

    |   5

      YOUR COMMENTS AWAITING MODERATION

       
       
       

      MORE NEWS HEADLINES